Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Chris Wallace is no Mike Wallace

"I knew Mike Wallace. Mike Wallace was a friend of mine. And, you, Chris Wallace, are no Mike Wallace."

No doubt those words have crossed a lot of minds in the aftermath of the Chris Wallace-Bill Clinton interview on Fox News. Without getting into the muddy minutia of who did more to "get" Osama bin Laden, let's take a look at what seems to be feigned shock and surprise by both Chris Wallace and the chattyheads on cable TV and talk radio.

Two words. Grow up! Or, go out and get a life in some other profession. The news media appears to be trying to explain their shortcomings in reporting and asking the tough questons -- and follow ups -- by turning away the attention they're getting and talking about the explosiveness of the former president's answer.

Anger? Explosiveness? Frustration? Do you really want to hear and see it? Get "out there" and you will. If the news media would get out of Washington and New York, they'd hear it from the folks who live and work in the 50 states. The chattyheads should quit talking among themselves and talk to real people in Ohio, Texas, California, Iowa and across America.

We could use a little more wider range of expressions -- anger, fear, disgust, horror, sorrow -- from elected officials -- especially those who are and were in the Oval Office.

As far as Clinton's "finger pointing" at Chris Wallace, there should be more finger pointing -- by the media, at themselves. The members of the media would better represent their profession if they would stick their noses into the hows, whys and what fors of real news reporting that the public truly deserves.

Chris Wallace inherited the job of Fox News Sunday morning talk show from Tony Snow who now sings like a Canary for the Bush administration. Before that, Wallace was a reporter and sometimes news anchor for NBC and ABC. It is tough for me to remember even one memorable news story that he ever brought to the TV screen other than a distant memory of an investigative story that he once reported on about a car repair shop overcharging customers. Can there be any doubt that Wallace is indebted to the Fox News powers for rescuing him from the work pits of the oil and lube shops and bringing him a little fleeting fame on a third-rated Sunday morning cable TV program?

If the media were mature enough, instead of trying to overdramatize what, in earlier years, would have been just another presidential interview, they would be taking an honest look at the way they report and present the news to the American public and the world.

Who cares if Wallace was "surprised" by the former president's anger? THAT has become the story instead of the content of the answer that Bill Clinton was giving. From the number of interviews that Wallace has given since the Sunday interview telecast, it appears that he is using the moment in the spotlight to further his career. Can a book be next?

If more public officials were as challenging and forceful in their answers as Clinton was, perhaps the "new media" would bring to the public a better news product.

When the media person (Chris Wallace) becomes the story instead of the content of the news story itself being the news, that's when it's time for the media to say, "Are we really being fair and balanced, and what's our obligation to the viewing public?"

There's too much entertainment in cable news. It didn't start yesterday. Mike Wallace began his career as an announcer and a radio-TV game show host. His son began his broadcasting career as -- well, who knows. But, it is a safe bet that Chris Wallace wouldn't be in the job that he is now if he hadn't been the son of Mike Wallace. And he is enjoying his ride on the coattails of his dad's reputation. And, he is no Mike Wallace.

1 comment:

Ron Harper said...

You hit the nail on the head!! What a great post.